Judge denies Karen Read’s motion to dismiss 2 charges against her

DEDHAM, Mass. — Judge Beverly J. Cannone has denied Karen Read’s motion to dismiss her most serious charge of 2nd-degree murder in a 21-page ruling released Friday morning. The decision comes 2 weeks after Read’s attorney Martin Weinberg argued that Read’s double jeopardy protections would be violated if Judge Cannone did not dismiss 2 of her 3 charges.

In her ruling, Judge Cannone wrote, “There was no acquittal on any of the charges in the defendant’s first trial, there is no risk of subjecting the defendant to double jeopardy by retrial on all the charges. Therefore, the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.”

“We respectfully but strongly disagree with the cornerstones of today’s rulings and intend a vigorous appeal to assert and uphold Ms. Read’s rights based on the Double Jeopardy Clause,” Martin G. Weinberg, Lawyer for Karen Read said.

Read’s lawyers filed the motion to dismiss after they say 5 deliberating jurors informed them the panel unanimously agreed to acquit Read on second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly crash before Judge Cannone declared a mistrial.

One of the jurors stated they were, “uncomfortable’ with how the trial ended,” according to the defense.

The Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office confirmed that 2 people who identified themselves as jurors provided similar information about the secret deliberations in voicemails left for Prosecutor Adam Lally.

ExpandAutoplay

Image 1 of 45

Karen Read

Read’s trial ended on July 1st after the jury reported they were deadlocked 3 separate times during 5 days of deliberations. The jury did not reveal that it had reached any decisions and never indicated they were deadlocked only on Read’s manslaughter charge in notes sent to Judge Cannone.

“Because there was no open and public verdict affirmed in open court rendered in this case, the defendant was not acquitted of any of the charges. The only unanimous act of the jury here was their representation to the Court that they were ‘at an impasse,’” Judge Cannone wrote in her decision.

Judge Cannone ruled the defense, “had multiple opportunities to voice an objection if they in fact had one,” adding, “defense counsel were no shrinking violets.”

Read is charged in the death of her Boston Police Officer boyfriend John O’Keefe in Canton. The case has garnered national attention over allegations made by Read that she’s been framed by law enforcement in an elaborate coverup involving first responders and relatives of the family that O’Keefe’s body was found on the front lawn of.

The prosecution maintains the evidence proves Read struck O’Keefe with her SUV while intoxicated.

Read’s attorney David Yannetti declined to immediately comment on the ruling when contacted by investigative reporter Ted Daniel

A spokesperson for the Norfolk D.A.’s office said, “We believe that the judge’s decision is consistent with almost 200 years of case law. We are moving forward to trying this case January 27.”

READ THE FULL 21-PAGE RULING:

This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.

Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.

Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

©2024 Cox Media Group